President Donald Trump’s effort to make sweeping cuts to federal spending apparently does not include the Department of Defense as he’s now touting a plan to approve a $1 trillion military budget.
During a Monday meeting at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump said he plans to build up the military with a massive budget while also touting the work of DOGE
in identifying fraud and waste in current spending. Trump said that despite the $1 trillion budget, he plans on being very “cost-conscious.”
Trump said:
We rebuilt the military during my first term and we have great things happening with our military. We also essentially approved a budget which is in the vicinity… of a trillion dollars, $1 trillion. And nobody’s seen anything like it. We have to build our military and we’re very cost-conscious, but the military is something we have to build and we have to be strong because you have a lot of bad forces out there now. So we’re going to be approving a budget and I’m proud to say actually the biggest one we’re ever done for the military. We’re cutting other things under DOGE… when you look at a woman getting $2 billion for environmental and it had nothing to do with environment and they had $100 in the bank and they gave her $2 billion. Many, many of those cases.
In 2024, the Department of Defense requested a budget
of $850 billion, similar to the prior year. It has long failed to pass an an annual audit
of its spending.
The president said
in February that he had directed Elon Musk and DOGE to look at Pentagon spending cuts. Musk’s companies having DoD contracts has been red-flagged
by some critics as a conflict of interest.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth celebrated Trump’s DoD budget promise, insisting the extra money would be spent “wisely.”
“Thank you Mr. President!” he wrote. “COMING SOON: the first TRILLION dollar [Department of Defense] budget. President [Donald Trump] is rebuilding our military — and FAST. (PS: we intend to spend every taxpayer dollar wisely — on lethality and readiness).”
Thank you Mr. President!
COMING SOON: the first TRILLION dollar @DeptofDefense
budget.
President @realDonaldTrump
is rebuilding our military — and FAST.
(PS: we intend to spend every taxpayer dollar wisely — on lethality and readiness) pic.twitter.com/WcZlNAHgDG
El año pasado en la ciudad de Miami fueron reconocidas durante la Semana del Latin Grammy con el galardón Leading Ladies figuras como Diana Rodríguez, Vivir Quintana, Ana Rosa Santiago, Julieta Venegas y hoy la Fundación Cultural Latin Grammy anunció la participación de estas destacadas mujeres del mundo de la música y el entretenimiento en la cuarta edición de su programa de mentoría Leading Ladies of Entertainment Connect TogetHER, en alianza con She Is The Music, una entidad global sin fines de lucro que trabaja para incrementar el número de mujeres en la industria.
Few things are as peaceful as falling asleep listening to the wind rustling through the trees or the pattering of raindrops on canvas. A camping trip is a great way to reconnect with nature – without breaking the bank. Here are some of the most gorgeous campsites in Europe.
Šenkova Domačija Farm, Slovenia
This “scenic” campsite is nestled within the Kamnik-Savinja Alps near the border of Austria, said The Guardian
. Dating back to 1517, the medieval farmstead is enveloped by “pastures and peaks”, and has just 25 pitches (including 10 for tents) in a tranquil meadow shaded by ash trees. Campers can toast marshmallows around the communal campfires and grab a bite to eat at the on-site restaurant or shop. Days are easy to fill, exploring the network of surrounding trails by foot or taking one of the farm’s resident horses for a longer trek into the mountains. pitchup.com
Dyrdal Gard, Nærøyfjord, Norway
“You won’t find a more spectacular place to camp than this”, said National Geographic
. Listed as a Unesco world heritage site, Nærøyfjord (pictured above), is Norway’s narrowest fjord
, flanked by “towering cliffs” and cascading waterfalls. Wild camping on the shores is permitted but the “sheer-sided topography” means it can be tricky finding a pitch, so it’s worth booking a “proper campsite” like Dyrdal Gard for when you arrive, before venturing further afield. naeroyfjordencamping.no
Camping Arolla, Switzerland
At 1,950 metres above sea level in the heart of the Swiss Alps
, Camping Arolla is Europe’s highest campsite. As you would expect, the views are “sensational”, said The Guardian. Guests can choose between camping or glamping, and there’s a shop selling organic produce along with a “help-yourself herb garden”. Hiking is the “name of the game” here, with an array of routes to choose from, including shorter journeys to alpine huts for lunch and demanding trails exploring the Matterhorn. en.camping-arolla.ch
Le Marais Sauvage, France
Sunny days at Le Marais Sauvage can be filled with “boating, bird watching and butterfly spotting”, said The Independent
. Situated in southern Vendée, by a stream in the tranquil Marais Poitevin nature reserve, the family-friendly campsite welcomes tents, caravans and motorhomes. Nearby you’ll find the charming village of Le Mazeau where you can “pick up fresh croissants and baguettes”. camping-le-marais-sauvage.fr
Quinta Viana, Portugal
Located in a river valley “shaded by eucalyptus forest”, this family-owned campsite, not far from Porto, is perfect for those seeking a peaceful break, said The Independent. With only nine bookings at any one time, you won’t have to worry about crowds. Unwind in the “flower-filled gardens”, go for a dip in the saltwater pool or take a trip to the coast to swim in the sea and “hike through the sand dunes”. Bliss. pitchup.com
Forest Days Glamping, Spain
It’s easy to forget “buzzy” Barcelona
is just an hour away from this remote retreat in the foothills of the Catalan Pyrenees, said The Telegraph
. Forest Days is home to just four “rustic but comfy” bell tents with super-king comfy mattresses and eclectic handmade furnishings. There is plenty to keep you entertained nearby, from wild swimming in the Aigua d’Ora river to hiking through the shady forest trails. forestdaysglamping.com
On the first episode of Everybody’s Live With John Mulaney, Netflix’s new talk show, the comedian gathered a panel of 11 actors who have played Willy Loman, the tragic protagonist of the classic play Death of a Salesman. He lobbed queries at the group, which included recognizable stars (among them Christopher Lloyd) and fresh-faced students, asking them to answer in character—but not about their performances or the play itself. Instead, the host asked such questions as “How much screen time should an adolescent get?” and “Are movies too violent?”
This meeting of the Willy Lomans was a strange, charming, and original bit
, the kind of thing that seemed like it could only have sprung from Mulaney’s mind; he’s long delighted in giving old-school American entertainment a modern tweak. It was a fantastically irrelevant piece of comedy that also let the comedian react to contemporary issues in his own specific manner: by gleefully summoning avatars of the broken American working man and using them to expose the ridiculous way we live now. This type of self-assured humor is core to Mulaney’s comedic sensibility—and a large part of what’s made his late-night experiment so fascinating.
Mulaney may very well roll his eyes at that analysis, and he’d probably be right to do so. The bulk of Everybody’s Live is clearly designed for the comedian’s amusement. The hour-long program, which airs Wednesdays and is Netflix’s first foray into weekly live programming, builds upon the six-episode series he did for the streamer in 2024, called Everybody’s in L.A. The ornery character actor Richard Kind is his announcer, barking non sequiturs from behind a podium. Each episode has a conversation topic with no particular connection to the week at hand, like lending people money or funeral planning; each one is just a subject of interest to Mulaney. His guests are a mix of celebrities and experts, yet the celebs make no effort to plug whatever current projects they may have. And Mulaney takes calls from viewers live on air, though if the person on the other end of the line rambles for too long, he will bark at them to hurry up.
In constructing this loopy hangout session, Mulaney is taking the standard talk-show format and languidly injecting it with some disorder. The audience never knows what might happen, but there’s also little chance of something truly maniacal going on. Mostly, the host is happy to chitchat, with pals and strangers alike. He has shown that he is as much an acolyte of the storied genre as he is an eager dismantler of it: When he emerged as one of the leading stand-up comedians
of his generation, Mulaney already had more than a little Johnny Carson to him. Like the late talk-show veteran, he’s a reedy-voiced midwesterner with a face every mother could love. Mulaney’s schtick, however, carries a salty edge. It wasn’t too hard, while watching him perform onstage, to imagine the comedian ending up somewhere like The Tonight Show, delivering zingers from behind a desk.
But late night has become a rapidly decaying format, as broadcast television—where it primarily lives—slouches toward extinction. CBS just canceled After Midnight, the variety program hosted by the stand-up comic Taylor Tomlinson, which airs after Stephen Colbert’s Late Show; the network has no plans to replace the series or fill its time slot. When Conan O’Brien
retired from hosting Conan on TBS, the cable channel began airing sitcom reruns in its stead. The Tonight Show, hosted by Jimmy Fallon,is still a TV institution; meanwhile, its excellent sister show Late Night With Seth Meyers,has been shedding budget, losing the house band
last year. ABC will seemingly retain Jimmy Kimmel as long as he wants to keep doing Jimmy Kimmel Live—it’s currently in its 23rd season—yet his deal expires this year, and he’s yet to sign a new one. Shows from other, newer entrants in the late-night field, like the comedy duo Desus and Mero
and the Daily Show fixture Samantha Bee, also ended prematurely.
Mulaney has many advantages at Netflix that his conventional-television peers don’t, however. He doesn’t have to worry as much about ratings; he does only one show a week, with just 12 episodes currently planned, and there’s more room to break from the status quo on a streaming service that has sought to upset traditional media’s apple carts. At the same time, Everybody’s Live harkens back to a chattier, looser era—like The Merv Griffin Show, where interviews could run half an hour or longer, or Tom Snyder’s The Tomorrow Show, a newsier hour of talk that aired after Carson’s The Tonight Show for eight years. Focusing the conversation on a particular subject reminds me of Bill Maher’s shows Politically Incorrect and Real Time, though Maher tackles more topical material; taking live calls reminds me of the stand-up comic Chris Gethard’s truly riotous The Chris Gethard Show
, which is still maybe the most electrifying attempt to remake the late-night genre of the past decade.
The resulting balance of serious and silly is perfectly amusing for a Mulaney fan like myself. Others might find the pithy gags a touch indulgent: Mulaney spends time fumbling around with a delivery robot and tossing beverages to his befuddled guests. The variety of pretaped sketches, including the Willy Lomans bit, may also fit into this category. But the pointlessness, as O’Brien emphasized in his conversation with Mulaney on his podcast last week, is part of the point. Rather than adopt the typical structure of a late-night show—celebrities telling cheeky, canned stories boiled down to 10 minutes or less—the host embraces weird, sometimes confusing antics.
O’Brien, one of Mulaney’s most apparent influences, articulated the appeal of this approach in their conversation: “We live in this era where I think people got intoxicated at some point with comedy having a point, and comedy meaning something, and comedy driving the conversation,” O’Brien said, referring to Mulaney’s absurdist spin on Death of a Salesman. “I think I just love when there’s a really funny idea that’s very creative.” An idiosyncratic sketch like that one, he added, “has a power that’s hard to understand, but it’s there.”
The “funny first” sensibility motivated O’Brien
during his many years as a late-night television host. To him, Mulaney, and their ilk, it’s much more important for comedy to be purely, anarchically funny, rather than speaking directly to “the moment.” O’Brien was also being a little coy: His own material can still speak to current events, even if he never trolls for “clapter
,” a term Meyers coined to describe the reaction of an audience demonstrating its approval instead of laughing spontaneously. O’Brien still has fun with societal foibles, just in a less direct fashion than some of his contemporaries. Mulaney’s approach to social commentary on his show is even more subtle; sometimes, concentrating a sketch on a character like Willy Loman is enough.
Mulaney’s comedic priorities have thus far kept Everybody’s Live focused—or as focused as such a program can be. Take a recent episode about cruises, which featured Ben Stiller, Quinta Brunson, and Mulaney’s frequent comedy partner Nick Kroll, along with a befuddled industry expert named Anne Kalosh. Kalosh sat chuckling as other panelists confessed they’d never been on a cruise and had no real interest in them, while Mulaney rolled with that irony chipperly. And when one caller’s story about life on a boat went on too long, Mulaney hung up on him. “It’s become a yarn, and we don’t have time for yarn,” he explained to his guests. “It’s a little rude, but also, it’s rude to waste the whole globe’s time.” He might be here to hang out, yet he’s still putting on a show.
A former law clerk to Aileen Cannon, the judge who dismissed Donald Trump’s classified documents case, is now serving in the DOJ under Trump’s former defense lawyer.
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act provides for federal criminal and civil penalties for harms from “racketeering.” Wednesday’s ruling in Medical Marijuana, Inc v. Horn
, like so many of the court’s RICO decisions, involves the civil penalties.
Douglas Horn was fired from his commercial truck driving job after he ingested a product marketed as including only CBD (cannabidiol, which is completely legal) rather than THC (tetrahydrocannabinol, which continues to be illegal in many contexts) and failed a drug test. Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s opinion for a sharply divided court on Wednesday upheld liability for damages to a business or property that flow from personal injury, a win for Horn at this stage. The case now will return to the lower court.
The question before the court involves the RICO clause that requires the claimant to show that it has been “injured in [it]s business or property.” For Barrett, it is wholly irrelevant that an injury to business or property might have been preceded by, or flowed from, a personal injury. She acknowledges that the statute “does not allow recovery for all harms,” because the “explicit permi[ssion of] recovery for harms to business and property … implicitly excludes recovery for harm to one’s person.” For her, though, that requirement “operates with respect to the kinds of harm for which the plaintiff can recover, not the cause of the harm for which [it] seeks relief.” She offers the example of “the owner of a gas station [who] is beaten in a robbery.” He “cannot recover for his pain and suffering. But if his injuries force him to shut his doors, he can recover for the loss of his business.” In other words, she writes, “a plaintiff can seek damages for business or property loss regardless of whether the loss resulted from a personal injury.”
Barrett presents the main argument of the defendants (led byMedical Marijuana, Inc., one of the the businesses that made the THC-laced CBD products at the center of the case) as viewing the reference to a plaintiff “injured” in a particular way as having a “specialized” meaning under which the originating injury must be “an invasion of a business or property right” that amounts to “a business or property tort.” Under that theory, because the initial invasion here was purely personal (ingestion of Medical Marijuana products), Medical Marijuana would face liability. But Barrett finds that in the contest between “an ordinary and specialized meaning,” the “context cuts decisively in favor of ordinary meaning,” largely because the specialized meaning is most common for references to a type of “injury” rather than to the people that are “injured.”
The defendants also urge the court to look to antitrust cases requiring allegations of “business or property injuries” to “track common-law torts.” Barrett rejects that argument, agreeing that the court’s “modern antitrust precedent forecloses recovery for certain economic harms” because of the court’s decision “to require … an injury of the type the antitrust laws were intended to prevent.” Previous cases, though, have conclude that “transplanting this … interpretation … into the RICO context would be inappropriate,” so she declines to do it here.
Barrett closes with caution, emphasizing that Horn’s case faces many obstacles. “First and foremost,” she notes, RICO requires a “direct” relation between the injury and the racketeering conduct: “The key word is ‘direct’; foreseeability does not cut it. … Given the number of steps in Horn’s theory …, this requirement may present an insurmountable obstacle in his case.” Second, she points to the requirement of a “pattern” of racketeering activity. Here, “harm resulting from a single tort is not a ticket to federal court for treble damages,” so Horn will need to persuade the lower courts that there was not only a single wrongful act, but multiple acts.
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, writing with some frustration that by the time the case came to oral argument the contentions of the parties were so far removed from those presented in the original papers that the court should have dismissed the case as improvidently granted. His comments echo the complaint of Justice Samuel Alito in Monday’s argument in Rivers v. Guerreroabout a “mini epidemic of cert petitions” that lead to arguments on the merits that are “quite a bit different from what we were sold at the petition stage.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Alito, filed a separate and vigorous dissent, expressing deep concern about the federalization of garden-variety tort litigation.
Despite the tone of the dissents, Barrett’s opinion seems to resolve the case on grounds that will not resonate widely in civil RICO litigation. Though only time will tell, my guess is that the case will not cause a substantial uptick in that area.
El periodista y analista de Lakers, Francisco Pinto, dijo que la sola presencia de Luka Doncic ha causado que la superestrella LeBron James cambie su manera de jugar.