Mark Cuban And Stephen Miller Throw Down Over Trump’s Tariff Plans: ‘Does Trump Make Products Overseas? Yes or No?’

Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, watches warm ups before Game 6 of an NBA basketball first-round playoff series against the Utah Jazz, Thursday, April 28, 2022, in Salt Lake City.

AP Photo/Rick Bowmer

Billionaire entrepreneur and Shark Tank personality Mark Cuban sparred with Stephen Miller over the weekend and into Monday as Cuban has taken to X in recent months to debate pro-Trump figures on various topics.

Last week, Cuban debated pro-Trump pundits about the former president’s plan to grow American industries with the “TAXATION OF FOREIGN NATIONS” – a term Cuban assumed means tariffs, which he argued would actually end up being paid for by American consumers.

“There is a huge difference between targeted tariffs and across the board tariffs,” Cuban wrote, adding, “And to be clear. Across the board tariffs are a tax on everyone. They make no sense at all.”

Miller, who is best known for his controversial and harsh approach to immigration, replied to Cuban, writing, “Mark Cuban epitomizes billionaire elites whose bottom line depends on offshoring, hence his support for the pro-offshoring candidate: Kamala Harris.” Miller argued in favor of his boss’s economic agenda and concluded:

Trump’s entire plan is devoted to building vast manufacturing wealth for American labor, Kamala’s entire plan is devoted to enriching foreign workers, foreign nations and her donors who invest in foreign factories.

Trump is for Pittsburg, Milwaukee, Detroit and Raleigh. Kamala is for Beijing, Bangkok, Ho Chi Minh and every other far-off place but America.

Cuban hit back by pointing out that Trump has long outsourced the production of products with his name on them to foreign countries. Cuban took a jab at Miller during the exchange, concluding , “You are a funny boy, aren’t you Stephen? First. Pittsburgh has an h at the end.”

As the debate continued, Miller jabbed at Cuban, claiming, “You opposed Trump’s China tariffs because you wanted to import cheap components from China, rather joining with us to restore supply chains to the USA. And you still won’t answer the question: how many Shark Tank companies have you advised to shift manufacturing overseas?”

“ZERO,” shot back Cuban, adding :

The first question I ALWAYS ask is how can we bring anything you source overseas back to the USA

Another fact for you. I invested in http://Wecultivate.us whose mission is to be a browser extension that allows shoppers to determine if a product was made in the USA

Now it’s my turn

Does Donald Trump make products overseas ?

Yes or No?

The two continued to debate by exchanging questions on other topics including immigration and the recent endorsement of Liz and Dick Cheney of Kamala Harris.

“Thanks for the immigration details. Just as you, the Immigration Czar, has espoused before. Which leads to a question,” Cuban replied at one point, adding:

Have you done any modeling of the financial impact of deporting 20 million people ?

Are you concerned that when he learns that the USA could lose 10m plus “customers and taxpayers “ , he will flip when he sees a decline in GDP ?

Or when he learns he would be the first President in a long time to intentionally implement programs that will reduce our GDP ?

What about the societal impact ?

Have you done any research or surveys on how people will respond when there is a “stop and deport “ or “knock and deport “ policy ? Or will you take another approach ?

Who do you expect to execute your deportation plan.

On tariffs related talks. Can you explain how he would “tax foreign nations ?” He hasn’t been able to. Does he plan on sending a bill to China ?

Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions. It’s appreciated

Miller replied at length, writing, “First off, I’m just an aide who’s had the honor of working for America’s greatest president and witnessing his unparalleled vision and unrivaled leadership. As to your question, growing GDP via mass third world migration makes everyone in America poorer (except those who profit from cheap labor) — per-capita GDP plummets. It is a vast wealth transfer from US workers to foreign workers and the companies who employ them (and to migrants on welfare and public support).”

“If America annexed Haiti tomorrow it would increase our GDP by increasing our population — but would make the average American poorer and the average wage smaller. And mass low-wage migration cruelly depletes the resources and safety net upon which American families, children and seniors alike rely. It is the most regressive economic policy,” Miller argued, adding:

Mass migration is a grave moral betrayal of the social contract that binds all citizens to each other and binds the government to its citizens.

This is to say nothing of the catastrophic results for public safety and human lives. Harris’ illegals have committed unfathomably depraved acts of rape, mutilation, torture and murder.

How many more Americans must suffer and die in the name of cheap foreign labor and the Democrats’ quest for political power?

The Harris plan to grow the GDP is clearly to resettle the third world in all 50 states. The Trump plan is to shut the deport, deport the illegals, and make America into the economic and manufacturing powerhouse of the world.

I’ll let Americans judge which plan they prefer for their families, neighbors and communities.

Miller then turned back to tariffs, saying, “Lastly, as to tariffs. Of course foreign countries are the ones who pay the tariffs — which is why foreign heads of state try so mightily to prevent tariffs from being applied when they cheat. The simplest example here is when a country dumps subsidized goods (say steel) in our market. A tariff on that country either a.) causes them to abandon product dumping and abide by the rules b.) further subsidize its own industry and great cost to the government — either way, the US taxpayer collects the revenue from the tariff.”

“Again, protective tariffs built America. Low taxes on domestic industry + tariffs on foreign industry = American manufacturing renaissance. We sustain ourselves and supply the world,” he concluded.

Cuban followed up with more prodding questions, “So what metrics should be used to measure or benchmark economic success for the country? And still waiting on answers on whether Trump makes his products here in the USA? You must have a few hats you can check out?”

“And have you done any modeling on what the economy would look like with the mass deportations?” Cuban asked.

Miller dodged the questions, writing in reply, “I’ll gladly answer the rest of your questions Mark when you can explain to me why Kamala voluntarily released from Border Patrol custody the two adult illegal alien males who then committed this heinous murder.”

Read more of their exchange here .

The post Mark Cuban And Stephen Miller Throw Down Over Trump’s Tariff Plans: ‘Does Trump Make Products Overseas? Yes or No?’ first appeared on Mediaite .

Nikki Haley Tells Fox & Friends Trump and Vance ‘Need to Change the Way They Talk About Women’

Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley offered advice for the Republican ticket on Fox & Friends Monday morning, telling host Brian Kilmeade that former President Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) “need to change the way they talk about women.”

Kilmeade brought up former Rep. Liz Cheney’s (R-WY) endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris, and played a video of Cheney being asked about Haley’s support for Trump despite previously calling him “unhinged” and “unqualified.”

“I can’t understand her position on this in any kind of a principled way,” said Cheney in the clip. “I think that, the things that she said, that she made clear, when she was running in the primary, those things are true. Casting a vote for Donald Trump or writing someone in means that you’ve made the decision, in too many instances that so many elected Republicans have made, which is to abandon the Constitution.”

Kilmeade asked Haley for her reaction to Cheney’s comments, and Haley retorted that she “respect[ed] her decision,” but the former congresswoman “can’t say my decision is not principled,” arguing that November was a choice to “vote based on style or we can vote on substance.”

“If you don’t like him, say you don’t like him,” Haley continued, “but you can’t say his policies are worse than Kamala Harris, that’s not a fact.”

Kilmeade asked if Haley would “appear on stage” with Trump at his campaign rallies, noting the “sizable portion ” of primary voters who supported her but not Trump.

“I have made it clear to him, a couple of things — one, that he needs to go out and ask for the vote of conservative and moderate Republicans, suburban women, independents, conservative Democrats — this is going to be a tight election,” replied Haley. “He needs to go say, ‘I need your vote.’”

“And the second thing is, I’m on standby. I’m happy to be helpful,” she added. “I don’t want to see Kamala Harris win. He’s the candidate — he can decide whether he needs my support or not.”

“But you would do it?” asked Kilmeade.

“Absolutely,” said Haley.

“Why do you think Kamala Harris has a 14-point lead in the gender gap, among women?” he asked.

“I think it’d because Donald Trump and JD Vance need to change the way they speak about women,” said Haley. “You don’t need to call Kamala dumb. She didn’t get this far just by accident. She’s here, that’s what it is, she’s a prosecutor. You don’t need to go and talk about intelligence or looks or anything else. Just focus on the policies. When you call even a Democrat woman dumb, Republican women get their backs up too. The bottom line is, we win on policies, stick to the policies and leave other stuff — that’s how he can win.”

Haley made similar comments to Face the Nation anchor Margaret Brennan over the weekend, characterizing Vance’s attacks on “childless cat ladies” as “not helpful .” The former US ambassador to the United Nations has been urging Trump to “quit whining ” and focus on issues for weeks.

Meanwhile, neither of the men on the GOP ticket seem interested in following Haley’s advice.

The ex-president has been giving incomprehensible word salad answers when asked direct policy questions, threatening to prosecute those he accuses of stealing the election from him, spreading debunked claims about migrants to support his calls to deport millions of people, and joking about the violent assault on Paul Pelosi. He’s also facing a total so far of $83.3 million in judgments after a jury found him civilly liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll and then defaming her — and he may still face additional lawsuits as he keeps repeating the same attacks on Carroll.

As for Vance, the “childless cat ladies” kerfuffle has been followed by a series of unearthed clips in which the Ohio senator disparaged his political opponents by attacking them for not having children (including some who actually do ), agreed with a podcast host who stated that “the whole purpose of the postmenopausal female” was to help care for children, and answered a question about how to lower the cost of daycare by suggesting other family members should provide free care (“Maybe grandma or grandpa wants to help out a little bit more, or maybe there’s an aunt or uncle who wants to help out a little bit more”).

Watch the clip above via Fox News .

The post Nikki Haley Tells Fox & Friends Trump and Vance ‘Need to Change the Way They Talk About Women’ first appeared on Mediaite .

CNBC’s Jim Cramer Mocks ‘Massively Inflationary’ Trump Plans He Says Would Cause Economic Disaster

CNBC’s Jim Cramer and David Faber mocked former President Donald Trump’s plans for mass deportation and tariffs, which Cramer said would cause an economic disaster on par with the Great Depression.

Two of Trump’s most ostentatious signature proposals are his “Operation Wetback”-eclipsing mass deportation program and his massive tariffs on foreign products — both of which have been panned by economic experts.

On Monday morning’s edition  of CNBC’s Squawk on the Street , Faber and Cramer casually torpedoed the combination as “massively inflationary” and a recipe for a 1929-style catastrophe — and Cramer offered a flip explanation for how Trump got his inspiration:

DAVID FABER: Our country benefits from immigration. Otherwise, I’m not talking about it so much.

JIM CRAMER: Good luck.

DAVID FABER: You don’t want to talk about immigration.

JIM CRAMER: Immigration. That’s the hot but– that’s the third rail for me. I’m not talking about– I once saw a mouse electrocuted by the third rail–

DAVID FABER: It’s nice that we we only talk about politics when forced to.

JIM CRAMER: Well, immigration keeps voices down, but I don’t know if you’re–

DAVID FABER: Yeah. It does. By the way.

JIM CRAMER: It’s a double-edged sword.

DAVID FABER: What does happen when you put tariffs on, on goods and you and you stop immigration and forced migrants to leave? In terms of wages.

JIM CRAMER: Well, unlesws you’re Hamilton. I’m kind of against it.

DAVID FABER: Isn’t that going to be inflationary?

JIM CRAMER: Of course! Of course!

DAVID FABER: Is it a one time though and then–.

JIM CRAMER: I don’t know. I mean when you see tariffs like that, obviously you think about 1929 to 32 and realize how wrong they are.

Or you see that I mean maybe is invoking Hamilton. Maybe Trump has saw the show. The show’s pretty good. Maybe he saw it twice. It’s very pro tariff. The show.

DAVID FABER: Our show is–.

JIM CRAMER: The show that you up the whatever it is. You know, the Hamilton. It’s a very, very pro tariff. You don’t think of that. But the show.

DAVID FABER: You mean the show?

JIM CRAMER: The the Broadway, the Broadway show. It’s very pro tariff. Hamilton was a the nationalist. So maybe, I’m saying Trump might’ve seen the show.

Watch the video above via CNBC’s Squawk on the Street .

The post CNBC’s Jim Cramer Mocks ‘Massively Inflationary’ Trump Plans He Says Would Cause Economic Disaster first appeared on Mediaite .

Trump Claims Mark Zuckerberg Told Him He Will ‘Never Vote’ Against Him After Assassination Attempt

LEFT: Donald Trump (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell) RIGHT: Mark Zuckerberg (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Former President and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump claimed that Facebook founder and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg promised he would “never vote” against him and not vote for “a Democrat” in 2024 in a new interview with New York Magazine‘s Olivia Nuzzi.

Trump told Nuzzi that after he survived an assassination attempt in July, “Mark Zuckerberg called up and said, ‘I’ve never supported a Republican before, but there’s no way I can vote for a Democrat in this election.’ He’s a guy that, his parents, everybody was always Democrat. He said, ‘I will never vote for the people running against you after watching what you did.’ So I mean, people really appreciated it. I don’t — I think it was very natural what I did. I think it was natural.”

A spokesman for Meta, however, told Nuzzi that “As Mark has said publicly, he’s not endorsing anybody in this race and has not communicated to anybody how he intends to vote.”

Trump had previously said that Zuckerberg said he wouldn’t be “endorsing a Democrat, which is the first time in his life that he hasn’t done.”

In his new book, Save America, the former president threatened to imprison Zuckerberg for “the rest of his life” if he used Facebook to “cheat” in 2024.

Underneath a picture of Zuckerberg meeting with Trump at the White House during the latter’s presidency, Trump writes that Zuckerberg “would come to the Oval Office to see me” and “bring his very nice wife to dinners, be as nice as anyone could be, while always plotting install shameful Lock Boxes in a true PLOT AGAINST THE PRESIDENT.”

“He told me there was nobody like Trump on Facebook. But at the same time, and for whatever reason, steered it against me,” continued Trump. “We are watching him closely, and if he does anything illegal this time he will spend the rest of his life in prison — as will others who cheat in the 2024 Presidential Election.”

The post Trump Claims Mark Zuckerberg Told Him He Will ‘Never Vote’ Against Him After Assassination Attempt first appeared on Mediaite .

The Hot-or-Not President

Donald Trump has a remarkably binary view of the world: Walls are good; migrants are bad. Tariffs are good; taxes are bad. People who love Trump are good; those who don’t are bad. And women are hot—or not.

Trump cares about everyone’s looks, of course. But as a former owner of the Miss Universe, Miss USA, and Miss Teen USA pageants, he is a self-proclaimed expert on women’s beauty . He spent multiple appearances on The Howard Stern Show rating women on a numeric scale. You can see him, like a teenage boy, sizing up every woman he encounters.

This is boorish, of course, but politically, it has proved useful. When he thinks a woman is unattractive, Trump has an easy way to dismiss her. He rips her apart. Carly Fiorina, he said, had “that face”: “Would anyone vote for that?” He once tweeted: “If Hillary Clinton can’t satisfy her husband what makes her think she can satisfy America?” He reportedly wouldn’t make Nikki Haley secretary of state because of “blotch marks on her cheeks”: “She’s not good for me. She’s got that complexion problem.” (He calls himself a “skin man.”) During their primary battle this year, he insinuated that Haley’s husband—a National Guardsman who was deployed to the Horn of Africa—had run out on her. He’s extended this same bullying strategy to his legal issues. His main line of defense in his civil trial for the rape and sexual abuse of E. Jean Carroll was that she was not “his type.” (Jurors found him responsible for the latter charge.)

Depressingly, this has been pretty effective. Erotic appeal is a form of power that Trump seems to actually respect. By declaring these women undesirable, Trump has portrayed them not just as bossy, unattractive shrews, but as weak.

[From the January/February 2024 issue: Four more years of unchecked misogyny ]

When Trump thinks a woman is hot, however, the situation gets a lot more complicated. And Trump thinks Kamala Harris, whom he will face for the first time onstage in tomorrow’s debate, is a certified hottie. He told Elon Musk in an interview that Harris, on the cover of Time, looked like “the most beautiful actress ever to live,” comparing her favorably to his own—presumably hot—wife, Melania. “I think we finally found the one thing Trump is incapable of lying about,” Desi Lydic joked in a Daily Show segment about the interview. “If he thinks someone is hot, he’ll say they’re hot. He’ll lie about winning an election, but he has deep respect for the sanctity of bangability.”

Still, there’s an election to try to win, so Trump is forced to take a different line of attack: suggesting that because a woman is beautiful, she must be dumb, and if she’s successful nonetheless, that’s only because she slept her way to the top. He’s used this strategy before too. He called Megyn Kelly a bimbo and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “not even a smart person.” He said Mika Brzezinski had a “low I.Q.” and implied that she had made it to Morning Joe only because she was dating her co-host . He told a female reporter once, “You wouldn’t have this job if you weren’t beautiful,” and wrote that “early victories by the women on The Apprentice were, to a very large extent, dependent on their sex appeal.” And so now Vice President Harris is “dumb as a rock ,” “really DUMB,” “VERY STUPID,” and so on. She only got this far, he has said, thanks to a romantic entanglement she had with the mayor of San Francisco almost 30 years ago, and she “doesn’t have the mental capacity to do a REAL Debate.”

This probably works on some people, but it’s hard to persuade the general public to dismiss observed intelligence in women just because they are conventionally attractive. On a dumber level, sexualizing women backfires because it reinforces the idea that women have a form of power. And it reveals that that power is working—even over Trump. Because when it comes to beautiful women, Trump is a lover, not a fighter.

[David A. Graham: He could have talked about anything else ]

We make so much of Trump’s sexism that we seem to dismiss Trump’s sexuality—and his open obsession with it. His comments about women are demeaning, but they are also lascivious. He’s a civilly convicted sexual abuser who has described his lack of impulse control around beautiful women on multiple occasions. As he told Billy Bush on the Access Hollywood tape, “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful [women]. I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet.” Lest we think age is slowing him down, just this year he told a female supporter at Mar-a-Lago, “All these beautiful women, you’re driving me crazy.” He accompanied this with a n emphatic gesture . Had his hand been just a few inches closer to the woman, he might have grabbed something.  

He honestly can’t seem to help himself: These women are more powerful than he is. “I have seen women manipulate men with just a twitch of their eye—or perhaps another body part,” he wrote in The Art of the Comeback. A famous germophobe, he’s always been terrified of STDs, but he still can’t help himself: “If you have any guilt about not having gone to Vietnam, we have our own Vietnam—it’s called the dating game,” he told Stern, and vaginas are “potential land mines.”

One really gets the impression that Trump would prefer not to be on the wrong side of any woman he’s deemed hot. Maybe one day, we can have a politics where female candidates aren’t judged by their physical appearance. Harris, unlike Clinton, has so far downplayed her gender, but Trump can’t see past it. Given where we are, it matters that Harris’s attractiveness is a challenge that Trump hasn’t figured out how to solve. It must make him nervous. If he finds Harris alluring, there is no doubt in his mind that America will too. After all, he’s the expert.

Click here to see original article