Why inflation is making us have fewer babies

Is inflation making American families have fewer children ? Yes.

According to the Department of Agriculture data and inflation statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, raising a child in 2023 could cost an average of $331,933 from the time a child is born until the age of 18. And that’s without the cost of a college education. 

In 2015, the cost of raising a child was calculated at just $233,610 and since then costs for day care, food and housing have skyrocketed. This means that, compared to nine years ago, an American family will need to come up with an additional $100,000 just to get one child through high school.

What are young families thinking about having family ? Well, they aren’t just delaying until later in life to have kids. Instead, they are opting to bypass having kids at all, with money at the epicenter of their decisions.

GEN Z VOTERS REVEAL ISSUES THAT WILL SWAY THEIR VOTE IN 2024

We are already at a record low birthrate, with the fewest babies born in 2023 since 1979. These challenges may not only affect the dynamics of modern-day family neighborhoods across our country, but they will also put us in a serious deficit position for the American labor force 20 years from now.

One issue that is resonating with young voters and affecting their financial desire to have children is home affordability. More than 9 in 10 (91%) of adult Gen Zers say housing affordability is going to be important when considering who they will vote for in the upcoming election. This issue was a higher priority than abortion rights, gun laws and even foreign wars.

In fact, it speaks to the financial issue on why more young people don’t want to have children and just how much the cost of living has affected their wallets and impaired their thinking of even being able to afford a family. Look at the home price to income ratio in America.

ANGRY GEN Z AMERICAN DETAILS ‘STRUGGLE TO SURVIVE’ IN VIRAL RANT: ‘I CANNOT AFFORD TO LIVE’

In 1980, the median home price in the United States was $50,000, while the median income was $25,000. Today, home prices have soared to a median average of $423,000 and the median income is about $65,000. That means the home price to income ratio in our country has tripled from a 2 to 1 ratio to 6 to 1 in 45 years.

Aside from the financial issues, Gen Z’s lack of interest in having children also stems from wanting to have more time for themselves, to travel and explore other lifestyles than having a family. The phenomenon that started in the 1980s called DINK (Dual Income No Kids) has become popularized on TikTok and is being readily adopted with this generation as a conscious choice versus having children.

Some Gen Zs even cite climate change and political instability as other nonfinancial reasons for not wanting to bring children into the world.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

It’s ironic now having three kids of my own in their 20s and thinking about, “How do I get them off of payroll?” and watching my children consider, “Do I want to bring someone on to payroll?” 

According to a Bank of America 2024 State of Gen Z’s Financial Health report released recently, over 50% Gen Z adults believe the cost of living is their biggest challenge and greatest barrier to their own success, which in turn plants those seeds of doubt on how they can take care of another human being.

With credit card debt approaching $1.2 trillion , student debt still hovering at $1.7 trillion, and over $1 trillion of outstanding auto loan debt, getting our arms around the rising cost of inflation across the board will be one of the most important jobs for the next president of the United States.

It’s not going to be just about being put gas in your tank, food on your table, or being able to make your rent payment, but about giving the confidence to the younger generations that not only is it a great idea to have a family, but also one that you can afford.  

Right now, the high cost of everything is making this generation think more about themselves than our future.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY TED JENKIN

Click here to see original article

I won’t stay silent about the scars from my transgender experience

When I was a child and suffering from numerous mental health issues, I learned about transgenderism . Vulnerable and in distress, I was given false hope by the pseudoscientific idea that I could become a boy. 

Encouraged by doctors that this could solve my issues and alleviate my unhappiness, I began a medical journey to make a “female-to-male transition” that left enormous physical and emotional scars. It did not solve my problems, but rather created new ones. 

My breasts are gone and what’s left in their place feels numb or painful. I haven’t decided which is worse – I miss one when I experience the other. Unnecessary prescription hormones have damaged my voice, my skeletal structure, and my hormonal system. 

This is my truth, my experience, my life. 

MUSK SAYS TRANS CHILD WAS FIGURATIVELY ‘KILLED BY THE WOKE MIND VIRUS,’ VOWS TO DESTROY IT: ‘MY SON IS DEAD’

It was hard to come forward and talk about my experience. I am attacked viciously online by the same trans community that love bombed me when I attempted to transition. Yet I have chosen to share my story out of love and concern for vulnerable children and teens who might be going down the same path I did. 

I don’t want suffering, confused teens to cut off their breasts thinking it will bring happiness. I don’t want sexual assault survivors to think that they can magically morph their female bodies into males and never feel vulnerable again, as I once thought.

FEDERAL JUDGE RULES FLORIDA RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSGENDER MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR KIDS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Today, I expect online bullies to attack me and call me names. But I do not expect reputable newspapers to do so for all their readers to see. However, in June, that’s exactly what happened. 

In the June 12 issue of the Santa Fe Reporter, ahead of the one-year anniversary on June 16 of New Mexico’s HB 7 taking effect, Independent Women’s Forum paid for an advertisement featuring my story. 

New Mexico’s HB 7 forbids public entities and associated individuals from “restrict[ing] or interfer[ing] with a person’s ability to access… gender-affirming health care.” Essentially, this bill discourages anyone from telling young people like me about the risks associated with attempting to medically “transition.” 

TAXPAYER-FUNDED PLANNED PARENTHOOD BOASTS ABOUT BEING LEADER IN TRANSGENDER MEDICAL PROCEDURES

They want children’s “gender identity” affirmed – regardless of how fleeting or how serious the underlying issues that are causing the wish to transition are. I know from experience how this can backfire on vulnerable youth and inflict irreversible, lifelong harm. 

The ad in the Santa Fe Reporter included a QR code linking to IWF’s Identity Crisis documentary series, which tells my story and the stories of numerous others who experienced transition and ultimately “detransition.” I think it’s information that children and their parents deserve to have. 

Following IWF’s advertisement, the Santa Fe Reporter reportedly heard from activists and others who disliked it. That’s hardly a surprise. I hear from people all the time who prefer I stay silent and call me names rather than have an honest conversation about the dangers of cross-sex hormones and surgery for trans-identifying youth. I wouldn’t have been surprised if letters to the editor to that effect were published. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

But that didn’t happen. Instead, publisher Julia Goldberg issued a large, full-color apology for running the advertisement, promised not to run further advertisements from IWF, and labeled our work “an online anti-transgender misinformation campaign.” That claim is blatantly false. Nothing in this series is anti-transgender . Nothing is misinformation.

Unsatisfied, the Reporter then published what it entitled a “Teachable Moment,” in which it labeled our work at IWF “anti-transgender,” and part of an “ongoing attack on transgender lives.”

Unbelievably, the story compares IWF’s advertisement (about whether teachers should face liability in the classroom) to White supremacy. It portrays IWF as in favor of the “eradication of trans people.” It then states that the Southern Poverty Law Center “includes IWF” in an “anti-LGBTQ pseudoscience network.” 

By labeling IWF’s basic educational resources – real stories from trans-identifying minors – as “anti-transgender,” the Santa Fe Reporter destroys any opportunity for common ground and understanding.

I won’t back down to bullies. I’ll keep speaking out and telling my story because I care about vulnerable young people . I don’t want them to suffer like I have. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY PRISHA MOSLEY

Click here to see original article

Three ways President Biden just helped Kamala Harris close in on Donald Trump

President Joe Biden has just gone from being his own worst enemy to being Kamala Harris’ greatest asset. I say that because the bumbling, unsure Joe Biden of three and a half weeks ago and since the disastrous presidential debate was absent on Wednesday night. 

To be sure, there were a few moments, indeed more than a few moments, where he stumbled over his words and expressions in his Oval Office address to the nation. But far more important was the brief 10-minute or so summary Biden offered Americans of his accomplishments. On Wednesday night, in the absence of a partisan political campaign, they suddenly seemed far more compelling than they did in the course of the now ended Biden-for-President effort. 

I say that because every point that Biden’s approval goes up from here on out will undoubtedly translate into additional support for Vice President Kamala Harris in her race against Donald Trump. 

BIDEN ADDRESSES DECISION TO DROP OUT OF 2024 RACE, INTENDS TO COMPLETE TERM IN WHITE HOUSE

In his brief address, Biden convincingly made a case for his leadership — both domestically and overseas — without direct partisan attacks or shrill and harsh rhetoric.

Most tellingly, Biden struck a theme that neither he nor the Democrats could have articulated while he was a candidate: “Passing the torch to a new generation.”  The president sought to inoculate Harris, perhaps not entirely convincingly, on her greatest liability — the Southern border and unfettered illegal immigration. 

Similarly, Biden made what I thought was a strong case for unity, stability and, most of all, democracy. 

Still, I don’t believe, nor would I mean to imply that this speech in any way changes or fundamentally alters the campaign to come. But it suggests that Joe Biden has been revitalized and can play three important roles for Vice President Harris.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

First, as chief advocate for the Biden domestic and foreign policy. Second, as chief advocate for a new, and frankly untested, face on the national stage – the sitting vice president. And third, not to be underestimated, after Wednesday’s speech, there will be a revitalized and resurgent ability to raise vast sums of money to combat Donald Trump and the Republicans.

Make no mistake, Joe Biden, with his brief 10-minute address, has gone from being a pariah among donors to a likely celebrity again. The president, who just one short week ago was shunned by the party’s richest and most influential donors, will undoubtedly be welcomed back into living rooms from the Upper East Side to West Los Angeles as he makes the case simultaneously for his administration and that of his hoped-for successor.

Finally, the president’s speech gives Democrats an asset they frankly lacked until Wednesday night: a sitting president who can make the case for the Party. Biden no doubt will join with former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama to demonstrate newfound Democratic unity both at the convention and beyond. Harris now has an opportunity at that convention, both on her own and with her choice of vice president, to lay out her own vision of the America she hopes to lead.

I still regard Donald Trump as the front-runner in the 2024 election, as the polls narrowly show. But with a newly compelling Joe Biden, a united Democratic Party and three presidents to advocate on her behalf, Kamala Harris has a far better chance of winning this election than anyone thought possible just a few days ago.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DOUG SCHOEN

Click here to see original article