A Netflix docuseries focuses on Piper Rockelle and the Squad, a group of child influencers, who were part of a lawsuit that involved abuse allegations and subject of a Times investigation.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday paused an order by a judge in San Francisco that would require the federal government to reinstate more than 16,000 workers who were fired by six agencies earlier this year. A group of nonprofits challenging the layoffs argued that the terminations by the Office of Personnel Management violated several different parts of the federal law governing administrative agencies. But by an apparent vote of 7-2, the justices nonetheless put the order by Senior U.S. District Judge William Alsup on hold while the challenge to the firings continues, explaining that the nonprofits do not have a legal right, known as standing, to challenge the terminations.
In a brief unsigned order, the court explained that it was not weighing in on the claims by other plaintiffs in the lawsuit – specifically, unions representing government employees, whose claims Alsup did not address because he concluded that he likely did not have the power to hear them. The court also did not weigh in on the propriety of the firings more generally.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor indicated that she would have denied the Trump administration’s request to pause Alsup’s order.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson also would have turned down the Trump administration’s plea, because she would not have reached the question of the nonprofits’ standing to sue at this stage of the case.
The layoffs of tens of thousands of probationary employees – that is, employees who have been newly hired for a position, usually within the past year – in February came as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to reduce the size of the federal workforce.
A group of nonprofits, arguing that layoffs could lead to fewer government services, which could in turn harm their members, went to federal court in San Francisco, seeking to have the probationary employees returned to their jobs.
Alsup concluded that although federal agencies can fire their own employees, the “Office of Personnel Management has no authority to hire and fire employees in another agency.” On March 13, he issued a preliminary injunction that directed OPM and six federal agencies – the Departments of Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Defense, Energy, Interior, and the Treasury – to immediately bring back the probationary employees who had been fired.
A federal appeals court rejected the government’s request to put Alsup’s order on hold while its appeal – which the court agreed to fast-track – moved forward.
The Trump administration came to the Supreme Court on March 25, asking the justices to temporarily pause Alsup’s order. Sarah Harris, then the acting U.S. solicitor general, contended (among other things) that the nonprofits do not have a legal right to sue, known as standing, to challenge the layoffs. Alsup’s ruling, she argued, also lets “third parties hijack the employment relationship between the federal government and its workforce.”
The nonprofits countered that they have standing to sue because the layoffs will affect their members – for example, the firings of workers at the Department of Veterans Affairs “has already had and will imminently continue to have serious negative consequences” for the members of a veterans’ nonprofit who rely on federal services. And Alsup’s order, they wrote, simply “restored the status quo that existed prior to OPM’s illegal conduct.”
The two-paragraph order on Tuesday explained that Alsup’s order “was based solely on the allegations of the nine” nonprofits challenging the layoffs. But those allegations, the majority continued, “are presently insufficient” to give the nonprofits a legal right to sue. “This order does not address the claims of the other plaintiffs,” the majority noted, “which did not form the basis of” Alsup’s order.
Sotomayor noted only that she would have denied the Trump administration’s request, without explanation.
Jackson explained that, in an emergency appeal like this one, “where the issue is pending in the lower courts and the applicants have not demonstrated urgency in the form of interim irreparable harm,” she would not have ruled on the standing question at all.
Although the court put Alsup’s order on hold, a different federal judge in Maryland also has issued an order, which remains in effect for now, that requires the reinstatement of probationary employees at 20 federal agencies who live and work in the 19 states (along with the District of Columbia) that brought the case.
Tuesday’s order was the second in less than 24 hours putting a federal district judge’s order on hold and allowing – at least for now – the Trump administration to move forward with implementing its policies. On Monday evening, a closely divided court lifted a pair of orders by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg that had prohibited the government from removing noncitizens designated as members of a Venezuelan gang under a March 15 executive order issued by President Donald Trump. The majority in that case agreed with their dissenting colleagues – Sotomayor and Jackson, along with Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett – that noncitizens are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal.
This article was originally published at Howe on the Court .
The post Justices pause order to reinstate fired federal employees appeared first on SCOTUSblog .
LindellTV reporter Cara Castronuova, 45, made the remarks while posing a question regarding the president’s impending, once-a-year physical to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Friday.
President Donald Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, joined Newsmax on Friday and was asked to weigh in on the Supreme Court’s ruling that the U.S. government must bring back a migrant deported and indefinitely imprisoned in El Salvador by “error.”
Chris Salcedo asked Homan, “Sir, as you know, who’s to blame here in your view? Congress for writing such a stupid law that promotes illegal immigration or the Supreme Court’s interpretation?”
“The alien is to blame. The alien entered this country illegally, which is a crime. He’s the MS-13 gang member, according to our intelligence and even that of the intelligence of El Salvador. He was given withholding and removal from El Salvador because of fear of gang violence,” Homan replied, adding:
Let’s be clear. President Bukele has changed the whole, the whole… face of El Salvador. He’s attacked gang violence there. The country is much, much safer than it was when the court made this ruling. So, listen, the Supreme Court says we’ll facilitate. We’ll facilitate. However, we’ve got to remember, he’s an El Salvadoran national in custody of the El Salvadorian government. So we’ll, you know, facilitate what we can, but I think we made the right decision.
The Trump administration had previously acknowledged in court filings that Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia had been deported as a result of an “administrative error.”
“The order properly requires the Government to ‘facilitate’ Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador,” the Supreme Court said in its ruling Thursday. NPR reported on the background of the case, noting:
Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran citizen, has lived in Maryland for almost 15 years. While he initially entered the U.S. without being granted legal status, a federal judge in 2019 granted him protection from being deported, because of concerns for his safety if he were to return to El Salvador.
The 2019 proceedings stemmed from uncorroborated allegations that Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, which the Trump Administration has since designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization. But an immigration judge ultimately found that there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation and instead found that Abrego Garcia’s life would be endangered if he returned to El Salvador.
Since then, Abrego Garcia has lived and worked legally in Maryland, and has had no criminal record.
Abrego Garcia is married to a U.S. citizen, Jennifer Vasquez, who told various outlets this week she had not heard from her husband since he was detained by ICE and insists he is not a gang member.
Watch the clip above via Newsmax .
The post Trump Border Czar Insists ‘We Made The Right Decision’ On Deporting and Imprisoning Migrant The Supreme Court Ordered Returned first appeared on Mediaite .
México busca defender su título en la Copa Oro 2025 y demostrar que viene en alza, mientras que Estados Unidos espera recobrar vida tras una desastrosa presentación en Liga de Naciones.
Impeachment
What Americans Think Of The Biden Impeachment Inquiry
Most aren’t convinced President Biden is implicated in his son’s wrongdoing.
By Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux
Sep. 14, 2023, at 3:41 PM
In the usually steady government bond market, the yield on the 10-year Treasury has risen to about 4.5 percent from less than 4 percent at the end of last week.
Sticking to a rigorous exfoliation of a matter of months, Kevin Macdonald’s double profile reveals an activist pair informed by a squall of ominous TV news.
A family in Philadelphia is outraged after a graveside platform collapsed at their loved one’s burial.
The Florida Gators men’s basketball team received a hero’s welcome as they returned to Gainesville after beating Houston to win the NCAA championship title.