Despite the eulogies, the postwar order did little for peace – and fuelled the rise of populism | Kenan Malik
Don’t rush to mourn the end of a liberal international order that too often put order before liberalism
The historian Steven Shapin opened his account of The Scientific Revolution with the line: “There was no such thing as the Scientific Revolution, and this is a book about it.” It is tempting to say much the same about the “liberal international order” (LIO), that “there is no such thing as the liberal international order and there are hundreds of books about it”. And this column, too.
There was a Scientific Revolution. And there has been since the Second World War a global framework that has helped order international relations. But whether that framework can be described as “liberal” or embodies what champions of the LIO claim it does – “an open world connected by the free flow of people, goods, ideas and capital” that was, in the words of Antony Blinken , the outgoing US secretary of state, “America’s greatest contribution to peace and progress” – is questionable.